|   
   
   
   
   
   
   | Happy Y2K Intel! 
      What a pleasant 
        surprise to restart this weekly column and realized that all the good things I was expecting for AMD happened! As we all know AMD shipped their Athlon 
        ( aka K7 ) on time putting away the x86 performance crown from Intel. The end of last year was a real 
        revolution for the x86 CPU industry. It was indeed the first time Intel had to catch-up with another x86 
        CPU manufacturer performances and it went pretty bad. Off course it 
        wasn't totally catastrophic for them due to the inertia of this market. 
        But repeated failures to deliver indicated that Intel was under stress 
        such as the bug in the i820 chipset( aka 
        Camino ), the 
        bugs in the early PIII-600Mhz, the quasi unavailability of the 
        Coppermine PIII-733Mhz, the failure to impose Rambus DRAMs. Most of these failures 
        were due to Intel compressing 
        schedules to roll out products way earlier than expected. For the first 
        time in a while Intel faced a problem AMD 
        suffered : the inability to produce enough high-end chips to meet 
        its customer demand. Many Intel believers such as Gateway ran into 
        troubles and were forced to bring back AMD 
         CPUs to their PC line.      Unfortunately for 
        Intel this is not their only problem… Another player is coming to the 
        game : VIA technologies. They have 
        designed a chipset ( VIA KX133 ) 
        that not only takes advantage of technologies Intel haven’t deployed yet 
        ( SDRAM 133 support ), but also is optimized for a non-Intel CPU ( AMD 
        Athlon ). This chip is predicted to sell very well due to the 
        indisputable technical superiority one would have building an Athlon 
        platform around it. Intel will 
        now have to catch-up on VIA as well. 
        Especially to design a chipset that support PC133 SDRAMs since 
        they turn out to be a much cheaper alternative than Rambus DRAMs  for about the same 
        performance gain…       At this point Intel have lost its technical supremacy 
        on two key domains : CPUs and chipset. It is not a surprise though since 
        Intel bet on several things like Itanium ( 
        aka Merced ) or a better acceptance of Rambus DRAMs. This has reduced the 
        efforts Intel put on the development 
        of its x86 line and killed any chipset development using other memory 
        types than Rambus. How is the giant 
        going to survive year 2000? Well time will tell us. But we should keep 
        in mind that giants are giant mainly because of their ability to come 
        back whenever they start losing ground. In any case some of the 
        elements key to Intel future success 
        will be the acceptance of Itanium 
        CPUs and Rambus DRAMs  
        by the market this year.  
Question, comment or objection : email
me. |